
The Tax Court case Betz v. Commissioner is a reminder that simply believing your work is “technical” isn’t enough to qualify for the R&D tax credit.
In this case, Betz claimed credits for projects he thought counted as research. But when the IRS challenged the claim, the Court agreed—his activities didn’t meet the IRS’s strict four-part test, and he had no contemporaneous documentation to prove otherwise. The credits were denied.
Every project in TaxDrone.ai is run through the IRS’s four-part test. If it doesn’t qualify, it’s excluded—protecting you from the same mistakes that cost Betz.
AI-powered tools connect wages and costs directly to qualified activities, eliminating the guesswork and unsupported allocations.
TaxDrone.ai captures project-level documentation as you go—so you’ll always have defensible proof ready for the IRS.
If an activity is too weak to survive an audit, the system flags it instantly—so you don’t file risky claims.
By filtering out non-qualifying activities and fully substantiating the rest, TaxDrone.ai ensures you get the maximum allowable credits—without audit headaches.