The $3.26M Lesson: What the Little Sandy Coal Decision Means for R&D Tax Credits

The $3.26M Lesson: What the Little Sandy Coal Decision Means for R&D Tax Credits The federal ruling in Little Sandy Coal Company v. Commissioner is now one of the clearest indicators of how the IRS evaluates R&D tax credit claims. The case denied more than $3.26 million in credits for a shipbuilder that designed and […]

Why Contract-Based R&D Credit Claims Are Being Rejected Before the Work Is Reviewed

Why Contract-Based R&D Credit Claims Are Being Rejected Before the Work Is Reviewed Many engineering, architecture, and design firms still assume that technically complex contract work can qualify for the R&D tax credit. The assumption feels reasonable. If the work is customized, difficult, and performed by engineers, it should count. Recent court decisions make clear […]

What the Populous Holdings Case Means for R&D Tax Credits Under Client Contracts

What the Populous Holdings Case Means for R&D Tax Credits Under Client Contracts The Tax Court’s decision in Populous Holdings, Inc. v. Commissioner is one of the most important rulings on how contract research is evaluated under the R&D tax credit rules. In this case, the court rejected the IRS position that the taxpayer’s research […]

What the Suder v. Commissioner Decision Means for R&D Tax Credit Claims

What the Suder v. Commissioner Decision Means for R&D Tax Credit Claims The Tax Court decision in Suder v. Commissioner is one of the clearer examples of how a well-documented R&D tax credit claim can withstand IRS scrutiny. In this case, the court upheld most of the taxpayer’s claimed research projects, allowed a substantial portion […]

How TaxDrone.ai Protects You From “Betz-Style” R&D Credit Disallowances

How TaxDrone.ai Protects You From “Betz-Style” R&D Credit Disallowances The Tax Court case Betz v. Commissioner is a reminder that simply believing your work is “technical” isn’t enough to qualify for the R&D tax credit. In this case, Betz claimed credits for projects he thought counted as research. But when the IRS challenged the claim, […]

How TaxDrone.AI Protects You From “Trinity-Style” R&D Credit Denials

How TaxDrone.AI Protects You From “Trinity-Style” R&D Credit Denials The case Trinity Industries, Inc. v. United States shows how even large, sophisticated companies can lose out on the R&D tax credit if their claims don’t line up with IRS standards. Trinity, a major industrial manufacturer, claimed millions in R&D credits for engineering and design work. […]

How TaxDrone.AI Protects You From “Moore-Style” R&D Credit Denials

How TaxDrone.AI Protects You From “Moore-Style” R&D Credit Denials The Tax Court case Moore v. Commissioner is another example of how companies can lose valuable R&D credits—not because they weren’t innovative, but because they couldn’t prove it in the way the IRS requires. The Moores claimed credits for their business activities, but the IRS and […]

How TaxDrone.AI Protects You From “Intermountain-Style” R&D Credit Denials

How TaxDrone.AI Protects You From “Intermountain-Style” R&D Credit Denials The federal case Intermountain Electronics, Inc. v. United States shows how even innovative companies can lose the R&D tax credit if their claims aren’t properly structured and documented. Intermountain built custom electrical equipment for clients and claimed R&D tax credits on that work. The IRS challenged, […]